← Weekend Werind: Redecorator’s Blues | Perfect Words, Imperfect Timing →
Howdy, friendly reading person!(With Opening Day and a spectacular site redesign upon us over at Bugs & Cranks, the content’s flying fast and furious over there.
Me, I’m just trying to keep up in my new digs with posts like Opening Day Quick-Hitters and Hope Sags Eternal at MLB.com. Check ’em out, if you’re so inclined. We’re playing ball now, kids.)
I had a revelation yesterday.
I was talking with a friend, and he was complaining about having to deal with morons on a daily basis. At his office, he said. Out at restaurants, he said. “In the car, on the phone, right this minute, and ” — heeeey, I’m standing right here, dude. Not cool.
“Morons are fine. Society needs morons, so we can have bungee cord testers and marketing executives and radio talk show callers.”
Still, he’s got a point. There are a fair number of morons out there in the world, and they do tend to get in the way of getting any work done, ordering a steak or commuting to the workplace / moron holding pen area. That’s when it hit me.
The revelation, I mean. Not my friend.
The thing is this: Morons are fine. Society needs morons, so we can have bungee cord testers and marketing executives and radio talk show callers. The morons who are clearly morons aren’t the problem. You can usually pick them out by their slackjawed expressions and extended warranty purchases and subscriptions to People magazine.
It’s the morons who don’t know they’re morons that cause all the trouble. These are the people who believe they’re competent and responsible individuals able to make a contribution to society. But when you ask them for directions, they send you the wrong way down a one-way street. If you ask for collated copies of your big report, you get them back upside down and taped together and interspersed with photocopies of assprints. When your table orders breakfast from them, they don’t take any notes — and then twenty minutes later, they shuffle back to ask whether you had the Spanish omelet or the oatmeal.
It was French toast, genius. And now it’s lunchtime. Maybe you should invest in one of those newfangled ‘pencil’ doohickeys. I hear they’re all the rage for the past five hundred years.
The key, I figure, is finding a way to identify these people, these morons-in-waiting, before they have a chance to infuriate you. To that end, I’ve devised a simple ten-part test that can be administered to potential morons to plumb the levels of their ineptitude. Or as I like to call it, their ‘Moron Quotient’ (MQ).
Simply put your favorite pet maybe-moron through these paces, and the truth will reveal itself. Tally up the MQ score, and you’ll know whether you have a ‘normal’ on your hands, or a mouth-breathing helmet-wearing moron. Let’s get to the quiz; note that some scoring options are not mutually exclusive:
#1. Lead the subject to a glass door with a handle reading ‘PULL’. Observe the subject’s attempts to pass through the door.
Scoring:
Subject pulls handle and passes through door on first attempt : 0 points
Subject first pushes handle, then stops to read handle, pulls and passes: 1 point
Subject repeatedly pushes handle, pulling only when told to by passing stranger: 3 points
Subject bonks nose or forehead on door while pushing handle: 5 points
Subject ignores handle and passersby, ramming door with closest heavy object to gain access: 10 points
#2. Ask subject to compose an email and send it to you. Evaluate the message when it arrives.
Scoring:
Email contains proper English, a short message, or simply the word ‘test’: 0 points
Email is written in all-caps: 1 point
Email is sent from an AOL address: 3 points
Email contains any of the terms ‘LOL’, ‘ROFL’, ‘BFF’, ‘OMG’ or ‘WTF’: 5 points
Email printout arrives days later in an envelope postmarked the day of the request: 10 points
#3. Disconnect subject’s keyboard cable from his or her computer. Observe subject’s reactions when attempting to access computer.
Scoring:
Subject taps a few keys, checks cable and reconnects keyboard: 0 points
Subject repeatedly bangs keys, slowing down keystrokes to convince keyboard to work: 1 point
Subject opens computer CD tray and peers inside to determine the keyboard problem: 3 points
Subject gives up and buys new computer to replace ‘broken’ machine: 5 points
Subject requests that Microsoft Vista be installed on new computer: 10 points
#4. Make certain the subject has access to several coins of each denomination. Ask the subject to give you change for a dollar bill. Observe the result.
Scoring:
Subject provides correct change, in any combination, in under two minutes: 0 points
Subject provides correct change, but requires more than two minutes to calculate: 1 point
Subject provides correct change, but must count on fingers and/or toes to make math work: 3 points
Subject cannot provide correct change, and offers more than one dollar for the bill: 5 points
Subject cannot provide correct change, and most of the change is crammed up subject’s nose: 10 points
#5. Place a TV remote control in subject’s hand, with the IR transmitter facing toward him or her. Note the number of ineffective ‘clicks’ made before subject determines that remote is backwards.
Scoring:
Three clicks or less before examining the remote: 0 points
Four-to-nine clicks before examining the remote: 1 point
Ten or more clicks or a change of batteries before examining the remote: 3 points
Turning television on manually and refusing to examine remote: 5 points
Making clicking noises in hopes television will magically turn itself on: 10 points
#6. Ask the subject to open a child-proof bottle of aspirin. Observe the results.
Scoring:
Subject opens bottle, using only hands, without assistance: 0 points
Subject opens bottle, using some combination of teeth, pocket knife or can opener: 1 point
Subject opens bottle by stepping on it: 3 points
Subject swallows pills spilled on floor after violently opening bottle: 5 points
Subject swallows bottle, unopened: 10 points
#7. Place a large uncovered cup of coffee in subject’s hand where wristwatch is worn. Ask the subject for the current time. Observe the subject’s actions.
Scoring:
Subject switches coffee to non-watch wearing hand and reports correct time: 0 points
Subject turns wrist to look at watch and spills coffee on ground: 1 point
Subject turns wrist to look at watch and spills coffee on self: 3 points
Subject doesn’t bother to turn wrist because subject cannot tell time: 5 points
Subject doesn’t bother to turn wrist, but spills coffee on self anyway: 10 points
#8. Ask the subject to recite his or her Social Security number. Note the response.
Scoring:
Less than three numbers reported, or ‘who the hell wants to know?‘ response: 0 points
Four to eight numbers reported before stopping: 1 point
Full Social Security number reported: 3 points
Full Social Security number, birth date, mother’s maiden name and name of first pet reported: 5 points
Elastic lining of subject’s underwear consulted to retrieve personal information: 10 points
#9. Ask the subject to sign his or her name with an empty ink pen. Observe their efforts to write with a non-functional pen.
Scoring:
Subject scribbles a few times, diagnoses problem and asks for replacement pen: 0 points
Subject scribbles many times, bends and/or disassembles pen: 1 point
Subject scribbles a few times, diagnoses problem and asks for replacement paper: 3 points
Subject at any point places the pen tip in his or her mouth: 5 points
Subject attempts to sign name without noticing paper is ‘Transfer Power of Attorney’ form: 10 points
#10. Glue a dime to the sidewalk outside the subject’s home. Observe his or her actions upon noticing the coin.
Scoring:
Subject spends fifteen seconds or less trying to pick up coin before walking away: 0 points
Subject spends fifteen seconds to two minutes trying to pick up coin before walking away: 1 point
Subject spends at least two minutes trying to pick up coin before walking away: 3 points
Instead of walking away, subject returns to home to retrieve hacksaw, pliers or blowtorch: 5 points
Instead of walking away, subject builds home addition to safely enclose coin: 10 points
Final Moron Quotient scoring:
0-9 points: Congratulations! Your friend is a rocket scientist, apparently. Or at least good at Boggle, probably.
10-29 points: Your friend may have a case of mild moronia. It’s nothing a little bed rest and a couple of aspirin — not the whole bottle — won’t cure.
30-49 points: Your friend’s idea of cerebral entertainment is probably watching Jackass with the closed captions in Spanish turned on. Not a subject I’d trust with sharp objects, children or cash.
50-75 points: I’d be shocked if your friend isn’t wearing a padded helmet right now. Or buying useless crap from a TV commercial. Or playing the lottery. And possibly all three.
70-99 points: There are rutabagas smarter than your friend. Actual, honest-to-god rutabagas. And rutabagas don’t even wear wristwatches, or register for Social Security. Pitiful, really.
100+ points: I’m a firm believer in evolution. But if your friend with this kind of score is still out there, stumbling and grunting and drooling around, then I’d be willing to admit that Darwin just might be wrong. Or at least asleep at the wheel. Get your friend a strait jacket, something shiny to play with, or a job in marketing, and get the hell out while you can. There’s nothing more you can do now.
I hope this handy guide can help you identify and successfully avoid the legions of knuckle-dragging slope-browed morons out there. And hopefully, if you take the test yourself, you won’t score too highly. Frankly, I’m sure you’re fine — I mean, you’re here, aren’t you? Just visiting this site shows remarkable wisdom and savvy on your part. No doubt you’re outrageously attractive and highly successful, too. Of course.
As for my score… well. Let’s be honest. I’m not taking the full test, ever. I once sat for three days with a flipped-around remote, trying to get the TV to work. It’s probably a good thing my wife has power of attorney already. And she always knows just what to write on my underwear. Ooh, look — something shiny!
Permalink | 4 Comments
You have done society a favor by creating this test. I am going to campaign tirelessly until this test is mandatory for anyone considering procreation.
Too funny, I must use this test on everyone at work, at play…
I will join the campaign!
i’m not sure i’d pass this test anymore since i had kids…
Faithful reader from Canada. This and the rest of your ramblings, thoughts, observations are absolutely entertaining. -Mike