Can someone please explain to me the reasoning behind ‘button-fly’ pants?
Honestly, isn’t life hard enough as it is, without adding apparel-related aggravation to the litany of nonsense we deal with? Personally, I like my clothes to be as simple and unobtrusive as possible — give me shoes I can slip into without retying, shirts I can pull over my head without buttoning, and pajamas with those handy assflaps for late-night emergencies. Now that’s convenience, folks!
(While we’re at it, ladies, how about more bras fastened with velcro, eh? It’s too late for me, sadly, but you could save whole generations of horny boys many hours of fiddly frustration by wearing picker-uppers that don’t require Plasticman-esque dexterity and a locksmith’s kit to unhook.
Or better yet, don’t wear the contraptions at all. Don’t ‘cross your heart’, ladies; have a heart. I’m just saying.)
But back to the pants. I’ve never quite grasped the concept of the button fly, when perfectly good zippers are readily available. Sure, back in the bad old days, that was probably the way to go. Cavemen probably ran around with button-fly leopard skins, because they were too busy farting around with fire and the wheel to work on a proper zipper. Maybe Socrates kept it real with a button-fly toga, and Columbus had to unsnap-unsnap-unsnap-unsnap to take his first wee in the New World.
But now we have the technology, people. There’s simply no need to bother with four or five persnickety little buttons when one good *ziiiiiiip* will get the job done. It makes no sense.
I’ve never owned a pair of button-fly jeans, myself — but I’ve dealt with them. My wife owns a couple of pairs, and — lord, honey, don’t let this get around — there have been times when I’ve had occasion to remove them from her person. As expediently — I really can’t stress this enough, people — as expediently as possible. If you know what I mean.
What I’ve found, of course, is that ‘expedient’ and ‘button-fly jeans’ are not concepts that play nice together. Unless you happen to keep a Jaws of Life kit under your bed, getting those damned buttons unhooked is an all-day job. I’m not sure I’ve ever managed it, frankly, without one of us falling asleep first.
(Usually her, but I do remember waking up once while drooling on her thigh.
Which would have been just super, but the damned pants were still on her. Bah.)
I can’t imagine those things come in handy when you’re rushing to the bathroom for some reason or another, either. You’d have to start undressing three rooms away to have any chance at all of hitting the bowl ‘running’, as it were. I have enough trouble with a simple zipper in those situations; if I had to actually think and work and fumble around, you might as well strap me into a diaper right now. I’d never make it.
(At least I wouldn’t have to worry about Something About Mary-style shenanigans in that case, but still — the remote spectre of horrifying genital scrambling is a small price to pay for easy access to the equipment in an emergency. Just so long as it’s ‘remote’. Very remote.)
So what brought all this nonsense on? Well, I mentioned above that I’ve never owned a pair of button-fly jeans. And that’s true — no jeans. I did, however, receive a lovely pair of sweatpants from my mother-in-law for Christmas, and discovered a few days ago that they are, in fact, buttoned up the fly.
And that got me to thinking. And I realized what you’ve read above — so far as I can tell, there’s generally nothing good about button-fly pants. Not the kind you’d wear out in public, anyway. But I did find a silver lining to the sweatpants I got for Christmas:
My mother-in-law has now made it possible for me to have sex with her daughter without actually taking off my pants.
Because you simply can’t do that sort of thing with regular, no-fly sweats. And you certainly aren’t going to get busy through an undone zipper, folks.
(That’s the kind of mistake you only make once. You think rug burn is bad? Try dabbing Bactine on zipper nicks down in your nether regions some day. That’s called ‘rock bottom’, folks.)
But with these buttony sweatpants — yeah. It’s just possible. What a world we live in, eh?
Now, don’t get any funny ideas, there, Scooter — this is all purely theoretical. It takes two to tango, and I’m not sure my lovely and oh-so-patient wife would see the inherent beauty of such a thing. And I’m fairly certain that’s not what my mother-in-law had in mind when she bought me the pants. This is pie in the sky talk, not pickle in the pants stuff, got it?
Still, it’s an idea. It does get mighty cold around here during the long winter months. Hell, at the very least, maybe I can give her the sweatpants, and let her wear them around the house. We may never do… you know, the ‘thing‘ in them, but at least I wouldn’t have to worry about getting those damned jeans off her again. That shit is work.
Permalink | 3 CommentsYou know, I discovered something else today:
To a guy, ‘Hey, I bet you used to be smokin’ hot!’ is kind of a compliment. To a woman… well, apparently, not so much. Apparently.‘
Okay, that’s all for today. See ya!
…
Nah, not really. I couldn’t possibly post entries that short two days in a row. You might as well ask me to sit down to pee. It’s just not natural.
On the other hand, I’ve got my irons in a couple of other fires right now — and no, that’s not sex talk for anything kinky, people. I wish. I’d like to have my ‘irons’ in a couple of ‘fires’ right now — nudge nudge, wink wink. Actually, it’d be pretty cool to have ‘irons’, in the plural sense, at all, come to think of it.
Of course, then I would have to sit down to pee, probably. So maybe that’s not such a great idea, after all.
Anyway, leaving my ‘irons’ out of this for a moment, I’ve been trying to write more lately. Not here, of course — hell, if I wrote more here, I wouldn’t have time to sleep, or work, or fiddle with my irons.
(That’s my golf irons, there, puppysnort. Don’t get all snippety and shit.)
See, the thing about writing here is that I don’t have to apply any of that… oh, what’s it called? You know, that stuff that real writers have… damn, it’s on the tip of my fingers — ooh, ooh, I know: discipline. Hell, I don’t even proofread most of this shit any more — I just go *blaauuuughhhh* on the keyboard for an hour or two, and there it is. Who’s got time to double-check their work at this rate?
(Actually — as though anyone really cares here, but still — I used to edit my posts, back near the beginning. When I was unemployed. And not doing standup yet. Back when I had eighteen free hours or so a day, minus a while here and there for showers and meals.
A lot of those posts were really long, too — up in the two, three, four thousands of words every damned day. Now, I’m lucky to throw down a few hundred words five or six times a week. I know, I know — I’m a pussy. Meh.)
Anyway, meandering back to the point — I think it’d be cool to write ‘for real’ some day. Maybe not ‘for real, for real’, like as a profession… but maybe. Someday. In the meantime, having something published would be pretty awesome.
So occasionally, I submit a piece for consideration. And it gets considered. And then it gets rejected. And then I make my sad little puppy dog face, and try again a little while later. And in between, there’s a lot of bitching and drinking and *blaaaauuuugh*-ing stuff around here. Someday, dammit. Someday.
I tell you that to tell you this — today, the ‘Humor Issue’ of the Improper Bostonian magazine came out. There were three submitted pieces published by local comics on ‘Boston life’. The following was not among them. See the puppy dog face? That’s the stage I’m in right now. But I’m also looking for the next opportunity to make that face again already, and that’s a record for me. I call that ‘progress‘.
(Psychologists would call that ‘delusional‘, but fuck them. Those bastards never got published in the Improper Bostonian, either. Fuckers.)
So, here’s the piece. Since they didn’t use it, I’m free to present it to you. Aren’t you privileged and snooty? And look for more of these half-baked rejects coming soon. Just hopefully not all the half-baked pieces. Somebody’s got to bite some day, right? Some day. Some day…
Eh, screw wistful. Here’s the damned thing. Maybe they’ll get better. Someday. Ha.
Boston, all things considered, is a fairly spectacular city. It’s filled with fun and fashion, Fenways and Fanueils, and lots of other interesting ‘F’-y sorts of words. But it can be daunting to the uninitiated. For a newcomer, Boston takes some getting used to — like a new pair of sneakers, or the latest Affleck arm candy, or the Sox winning the World Series.
(And be sure to take full advantage of that last one. Remember, this is our afterglow — it’s the only time in our lives when the Red Sox can distract us from other depressing stuff in the world. Use it or lose it.)
Anyway, I moved to Boston myself just a few short years ago. You’ve probably already noticed from my accent that I didn’t grow up around here. I don’t ‘pahk my cahr’, for instance. I don’t ‘faht in chuhch’. And I don’t get chicks ‘hammehed’ and chain them to the ‘radiatah’.
(Well, okay — just once. But she was wicked begging for it.)
Now, I’ve learned a lot about Boston life during my time here. I’ve learned that Sam Adams was a brewer and a patriot — in that order. I’ve learned that in Cambridge, both geese and college students have a ‘blank check’ right-of-way for crossing the streets — and that the geese are generally smarter about it. And I’ve learned that winter here lasts six months — or nearly as long as the ‘Broons’ NHL hockey season.
(There’s no ‘I’ in team, and apparently we’re not supposed to pronounce the ‘I’ in ‘Bruins’, either. I learned that, too.)
I’ve also learned that, somehow, ‘MBTA’ shortens to ‘T’, as opposed to something boring and predictable like ‘M’ or ‘Mibta’ or ‘subway’. Speaking of which, I’ve also learned that it’s generally best to treat the T like a Taco Bell restroom — which is not to say that you should pee on the walls when you think there’s nobody looking. Rather, it’s best to use the T when there are relatively few other people using it, too. Riding the T during rush hour is a lot like holding a family reunion in the trunk of your car. Assuming your reunions are catered by Dunkin Donuts, of course.
Getting around Boston by car poses its own issues — the ‘Big Dig’ foremost among them. You see, there’s no real end to the Big Dig. The project has been ongoing for many years — perhaps since ancient times, when cavemen first scraped dirt away from the Sumner Tunnel with their bare, hairy-knuckled hands. And it will continue forever, in some form or another. Today, they’re fixing ‘normal’ leaks in the tunnel under the Charles River. In a thousand years, it’ll be costly repairs to the hoverbus lane on the Tom Brady Memorial Bridge, or orange pylons blocking access to the express teleporters outbound to the airport. Get used to it.
If you’re determined to drive your way around the Hub, there’s still the problem of getting directions. Never mind that there’s a Harvard Street and Beacon Avenue in every postage stamp-sized town surrounding Boston proper. I have more trouble with pronouncing the names of those towns — squeezing ‘Meffid’ out of Medford took some practice. Or how about ‘Leominster’, with its mysterious silent ‘o’– that’s just nonsense. There’s no such thing as a silent ‘O’; Dr. Ruth’s been preaching that for years. Worst of all, though, is Dorchester.
(Yes, I know it looks just like it sounds — and that’s precisely the problem. I just got used to Worcester being ‘Woostah’, and Gloucester morphing into ‘Glahstah’. So why wouldn’t Dorchester be ‘Distah’, then? If you’re going to mangle the language, at least be consistent. Work with me here.)
Honestly, though, I’ve grown accustomed to life in Boston. The endless snow shoveling, the annual Patriots Day hullabaloo, setting out for Chelsea and ending up in Chelmsford — all are small prices to pay to live in one of the finest cities on the planet.
(And the only place where it’s acceptable etiquette to chant ‘Yankees suck!’ in any situation — baseball games, Pops concerts, weddings, you name it. It’s sort of the unofficial city motto. We should have it tiled into the City Hall floor.)
But after five years in Boston, I�m still learning about how to get along here. There’s still much to learn. Wicked much.
Permalink | 5 CommentsYou don’t want to know why, exactly, folks, but something just occurred to me:
There are very few professions in which picking up the nickname ‘Picklepants’ can be considered a ‘plus’.
I think that’s all for now.
But if there are any further developments, you’ll be the first to know. I promise.
Permalink | 7 CommentsMan, what a slow weekend.
I don’t know about you folks, but I’ve done nothing in the past two days. Nothing. No things. Nada.
Watched a lot of TV, though. The TiVo is tapped out — I burned through a couple of Law and Orders, three Simpsons, two Futuramas, and a Home Movies. Plus parts of all three Matrix movies on HBO, and the Syracuse game last night. A lesser man would be tired of television. Pooped. On to bigger and better things.
Me, I’m watching my new Comedian DVD. I am Iron Man. Color me trooper.
It’s a cool flick — it’s ostensibly about Jerry Seinfeld’s return to standup. And there’s a bit of that — you see some of Seinfeld’s new jokes, and some other comedians doing some bits, and that’s fun. But the fascinating part — at least for someone like me — is the insight into the life of a pro comic. The pressures, the personalities, the late nights, the drinking, the bullshitting, the worrying… now that’s entertainment. Last Comic Standing is for babies — this is the real shit, unadulterated and, for the most part, not terribly pretty. It’s awesome.
And, honestly, it’s a lot like what I see at comedy nights and open mics around Boston. Without the fame and respect and laughs and money and audiences and success, of course. For the most part — I’ve done shows with a few successful people, mind you. Gary Gulman. Bill Braudis. Todd Barry.
(I didn’t meet any of these people; don’t misunderstand. I doubt if any of them saw my set, and they couldn’t pick me out of a police lineup, for certain. Unless I steal their car stereo one day, and they get a good look at me — maybe then. Short of that, it’s a purely one-way thing. And that’s cool.)
Anyway, it’s interesting to see how the process stays largely the same. The talent grows, the material builds, but the process is pretty similar. Writing and practicing and rewriting and performing and practicing again and banging your head with a large, blunt object and drinking heavily and rewriting and then finally, maybe, having something worth performing again. It’s a process, really.
Now, there’s one thing that I don’t normally do, but you see a lot of it in the film, and at open mics everywhere — taking notes on stage. Not that I think there’s anything wrong with carrying notes up there — hell, people way funnier than me or anyone I know take notes onstage. I’ve got no room to talk. I just don’t do it myself — maybe that means I don’t do enough shows, if I actually have time to rehearse and remember all the shit without a crib sheet. I don’t know.
I just think it makes people a little nervous, if you need notes to do your job. That wouldn’t work in most professions. You wouldn’t want to go to a doctor and hear:
‘Okay, please take off your pants, and… um, let’s see here… I’m supposed to put my hand, uh, here, it says, and… what’s next? Oh — cough, please. Right. Always forgetting that bit.‘
(Because you never want to have a doctor’s visit that reminds you of summer camp. That’s a little personal rule of mine. Maybe you feel the same. Or not. Cough, please. Thanks.)
Same thing with firemen or salesmen or even lawyers:
‘Your honor, I — um, hold on, I know this one. Lemme check my notes… wait, wait… oh, ‘object’. Object! Yes, I object! Hey!‘
Actually, the only other profession that gets a pass on the whole ‘cheat sheet’ thing is teaching. I’m not sure why that is, exactly. Maybe we want to make sure they’ve got their shit right. I mean, let’s face it — they’re raising the kids. Whole generations are depending on whether teach knows when the War of 1812 happened. If they fuck that up, we’ll… um, well, I don’t know. We’ll never have some goober win seventy consecutive Jeapordy shows again, I’ll tell you that. That war shit comes up at least once a week on there.
Anyway, I’m just saying. Whatever — I’m going back to TV now. At least I’ll get out of the house this afternoon, to go to a Super Bowl party. Where we’ll watch the game, of course. On TV. It’s all circles within circles here. Circles within circles, all within the boob tube.
Have a great Sunday, folks. The commentary track is on now, and I wanna hear the comics make fun of each other. Good times, good times. I’m out. Later.
Permalink | 4 CommentsThey say, ‘you can tell a lot about a person from the company they keep’.
I’m not sure I’d agree with that.
(And I’m pretty damned certain my friends wouldn’t. Or my family. Or my wife. Or the dog, for that matter.
Frankly, it’s probably in my best interest that they don’t think too carefully about it, so don’t fricking remind them, all right? I think I spend quite enough time alone as it is.)
As a matter of fact, the assertion is so ridiculous and out of date that I think we should replace it. Not simply expunge it, you understand — certainly, you need something to ‘tell you a lot about a person’. Without some sort of handy barometer to make snap judgements with, how would we ever feel anything about anyone? Who’s got time to form opinions of other people based on real personality and wit and character? Not I. ‘Forging relationships’? Honky, please. You’re exhausting me.
But what to replace ‘the company one keeps’ with, eh? It’s a tricky question, and one that I can’t answer definitively just at the moment. However, I can provide a few suggestions, and let you decide which you think is best. Or make your own list; maybe you can tell a lot about a person from whether they like to make lists or not. I don’t know. But again, I think I hope not, ’cause here’s mine:
‘You can tell a lot about a person from the contents of their pockets.‘
Probably true. Certainly, my own life is usually pretty well summed up by six dollars, a smudged ID, a fistful of lint, and a set of keys with a nifty attached bottle opener. It’s downright metaphorical, really.
But I already know a lot about me.
(Too much, some would say. What can I tell you — I’m all about any kind of ‘self-exploration’ that doesn’t involve petroleum jelly. And maybe a couple that do. But only on weekends. Moving on.)
And how often do you get to go through someone else’s pocket stuff? That’s the weakness of this one — by the time you get to what’s actually in your subject’s pockets, you already know all you need to know about them. I’ve tried it, and I’ve found that the people willing to participate are usually one of three types:
(And specifically, a dead drifter, because those are the only ones who let me rummage through their shit. And they always have pretty much what you’d expect a dead drifter to have in his pockets. Namely, six dollars, a smudged ID, a fistful of lint, and a set of keys with a nifty attached bottle opener.
You know, suddenly I’m liking this one less and less. Next!)
‘You can tell a lot about a person from the names of their pets.‘
This one’s a little trickier, of course, because lots of people have kids and spouses and imaginary friends, and sometimes those people are also involved in the naming of the domesticated critters.
(In which case, you can pretty well judge a person by the name of the person they’ve married, or what they’ve named their kids, or their pretend friend.
Honestly, it’s one thing to have a cat named ‘Snookums’ strutting around the house. Maybe one of your kids is responsible for that. But if the kid in question is named ‘Delbert’ or ‘Bunifa’, then you’ve got no one but yourself to blame. I don’t give a damn whose idea it was.)
Just for the record, our dog is named ‘Susie’. I’m not sure what that says about my wife or me, exactly, but it seems fairly innocuous. And if it helps my case at all, when we adopted the dog, her name was ‘Xena’, and we changed it.
(Of course, since then I’ve tried to get my wife to answer to ‘Xena’, with only marginal success. She won’t wear the costume, either. And the dog won’t fit into it, so it’s just a waste of good leather and spandex. Sad, really.)
Let’s try another one.
‘You can tell a lot about a person from how far they spread their legs to pee.‘
Okay, this one might only apply to the men out there, seeing as how we usually stand up to pee. If a woman tried to suddenly spread-eagle herself on the can, the stream would probably smack right into the stall door. With enough arch, it might even shoot over it, which is not something that anyone wants to have to explain. Liquid seeping out of an occupied bathroom stall is one frightening, willy-inducing thing. Any sort of squirting action is quite another, and not in a good way.
So let’s limit this discussion to the gents in the hizzouse. From casual observation — no, dude, really, it was just casual observation; I wasn’t ‘peeking’, okay? Get back to your ‘business at hand’, so to speak — I can tell you that there’s quite an impressive range of ‘urinal stances’ in use out there.
Some guys, they like to spread out — I guess the idea is to air things out down there, while they’re lightening up the old bladder. Other guys play it more conservatively, with feet together and furtive glances over their shoulder from time to time. I’m not sure what they think is happening behind them, exactly — but they seem to want to stay apprised of the situation back there, regardless. Maybe they’re prone to stalkers. Or maybe they’ve been involved in some sort of ‘unpleasantness‘ while standing at a urinal in the past. Like in prison, perhaps. I can understand how that might make one a bit skittish.
Me, I’m in between. I don’t click my heels together and wish for Kansas while I’m taking a ‘wiz’, but neither am I doing a fricking split in front of the pisser, either. Shoulder width, baby — shoulder width. Nice and easy, that’s my style. And I only shake it twice — just for the record.
Folks, this list could go on indefinitely — and keep getting progressively sillier, no doubt — but I’ve troubled you enough for one night. Hopefully, though, I’ve convinced you that ‘the company one keeps’ is not the only measure of a person’s character. All you’ve got to do to gather more information is dump out their pockets, spy on their pets, and watch them use the bathroom. And doesn’t that sound a lot easier than paying attention to who they hang out with? Honestly, I can’t understand why no one’s had these ideas before. This is basic shit, people.
Permalink | 2 Comments