A few days ago, I found an invitation to Google+ in my inbox. I had an opportunity, thanks to a friend of mine on the ‘inside’, to be in one of the first few waves of users to experience all that Big Mother Google had in store with this new set of features. I hovered my cursor over the link to sign up.
And hovered some more.
And kept on hovering. It was getting a little uncomfortable, frankly, the arrow just sitting there like a little cursor teabag gone wrong. And still I didn’t click the link.
“Sparks? Hangouts? Circles? Were these social networking tools, or bedroom names at a swingers’ party?”
Why? I was thinking through whether I really, truly wanted to. New sites and features are cool — but they’re not always worth the hassle. Is a Google Facebook better than a Facebook Facebook? What did I really know about this thing, anyway? Sparks? Hangouts? Circles? Were these social networking tools, or bedroom names at a swingers’ party? I didn’t know. And I decided I could live without finding out. I wasn’t going to click the link.
Then I sneezed. And accidentally clicked the link.
So now I’m on Google+. Yay for involuntary spasms, I suppose.
But now that I’m in, I’m more flummoxed than ever. Not because I don’t understand it, exactly. It’s just another freaking thing — another little cluttered corner of the interwebs — that I’m supposed to customize and configure and set up just the way I want it. And therein lies the problem. I don’t ‘want it’, per se. I just have mild allergies, and was mousing in the wrong place at the wrong time when they kicked in.
So I don’t especially want to think about things like ‘Circles’. That’s one of the features Google is touting, crowing about the granularity it provides. On Facebook, everyone’s a ‘friend’. There’s no way to differentiate — you toss your best friend in with your nosy aunt with the neighbor’s kid’s barber’s meth dealer, and just try to keep them straight. This Google+ doodad is better, says the docs, because now you can stratify people into different ‘circles’ and treat them each as you like.
Well, that’s just great — if you’re the kind of person who pigeonholes people you know into little restrictive boxes, and never thinks of them differently once you’ve attached a prejudicial label of some kind to your conception of them.
And I am. Totally. But I never had to do it so systematically. And it’s frustrating as hell.
Just for instance, let’s say I created a circle named “People Who Try to Tell Me About What Happened on ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ and Don’t Take a Hint That I Don’t Give Half a Rat’s Pimply Ass, So I Stopped Returning Their Emails”. Just theoretically. And let’s say I filled that circle up with lots of people I know. And let’s say, for the sake of argument, that I had another circle called “Any Jackhole Who’s Ever Mentioned the Show ‘Dancing with the Stars’ to Me in a Positive Light”. And I put another bunch of people in that circle. Hypothetically.
Well, that’s a lot of freaking work right there. And I’ve only covered two kinds of people — two kinds who aren’t mutually exclusive, I might add. There’d be a lot of ‘two-strike’ cowboys in that rodeo, is all I’m saying. A lot. And that barely touches the television category. What about all the people I want to treat differently based on the way they dress, or what word they use when they answer the phone, or where they suggest for lunch, or which way they put the toilet paper roll on the holder, or how they feel this week about high-fructose corn syrup? Keeping all these people straight in my head is hard enough — now I’m supposed to document all these crazy tendencies and behaviors? What am I, Sigmund Freud over here all of a sudden?
So I ditched all that nonsense. I pared it down to one circle — “Just Zis Guy, You Know?” — and dumped everybody I ever met online or off into that. So now it’s Facebook again, only without the poking. Unless all the poking happens in the ‘Hangout’ bedroom. I don’t think I have the secret sexy password for that.
For the sake of trying it, I clicked on ‘Sparks’ to see what the hell it is. Sadly, what it wasn’t was an homage to the semi-obscure L.A. band of the same name. And sadlier, when it turned out to be some kind of shared interest finder doohickey, the ‘Featured Interest’ list included ‘Fashion’, ‘Cycling’, ‘Gardening’ and ‘Recipes’.
I feel like I just ran the “Shit I’ll Have an Interest In When I’m Dead, Buried, and Pooped Through a Bunch of Worms” category on Jeopardy.
(“I’ll take Rock Tumbling for $500, Alex.” “Oooooh — that’s the Daily Double!”)
Insofar as I’m still logging in occasionally, I’m giving Google+ a chance. And people that I know are trickling in — mostly saying the same things I see them saying on Facebook or Twitter or in the bar down the street when we meet up for drinks. Is another outlet really necessary? Are we going overboard with this social networking frenzy? Do swingers’ parties really have signs on the bedroom doors?
Don’t ask me. I’m just zis guy, you know?
Permalink | 2 CommentsNo, today’s title is not a flashback to some underaged Bartles and James brouhaha.
(It could be. But it’s not. Not today.)
Instead, it’s in reference to the latest assignment for the sketch writing class I’ve been taking over at ImprovBoston. This time, we’re tasked with writing ‘blackout’ sketches. And there’s nary a wine cooler or bottle of Thunderbird involved.
Rather, a blackout sketch is a short bit that sets the audience up for one situation, then quickly yanks the rug out from underneath. As soon as it happens, the lights fade to black, and we’re on to the next thing. They’re used as segues in skit shows or a change of pace; blackouts are the non sequitur of the sketch comedy world, apparently.
“I liken them to having sex with a random person down at the local Greyhound station.”
(I liken them to having sex with a random person down at the local Greyhound station. There’s something in it for both parties, but it’s not entirely comfortable, no one gets fully satisfied, and it’s best to keep it as short as possible before anyone thinks too hard about what just happened.
Your likening may vary. Naturally.)
Also, the teacher told us, they’re really stupid hard to write.
I have a thought about that. In a moment.
First, I’ll say two things about this assignment. One, we had the holiday weekend off, so we’ve had two weeks to simmer in this challenge. Now, when you give me too much time to think about something, one of two things is going to happen. Either I’ll forget about it entirely — which is more likely, by far — or I’ll go way, way overboard and put more effort into the thing than it probably was meant to warrant.
And two, we were supposed to try to write one ‘blackout’ for class tomorrow. Below are four. And this is just the first half.
I think I can fairly say at this point that blackout sketches really aren’t that hard to write at all. Now, writing a good blackout sketch… well. I don’t think I have an opinion on that yet. I need another two weeks. At least.
In the meantime, here’s a four-pack of quick-hitters. Look for four more tomorrow, if you dare. Happy weekend.
SPEED RACER
[A couple stands near one edge of the stage. On the opposite side, Kenny enters making ‘vroom’ and tire-screeching noises as he mimes driving a car in at high speed and parking it.
Kenny mimes exiting the car and celebrating, pumping his fists in the air and yelling. A backflip would be ideal. He mimes shaking up a champagne bottle and spraying the crowd and himself, and taking a swig. The couple opposite watch passively.
Kenny makes his way toward their end of the stage, still pumping and hooting. On his way past, he mimes tossing something in the air, which the man in the couple catches. The couple walk toward the ‘car’ opposite, somewhat bewildered. The man stops to open the door for the woman, shaking his head.]
MAN: Weirdest valet. Ever.
ELEMENTARY!
[Several people stand around the stage, with Holmes near the front. The others are silent and attentive as Holmes speaks.]
HOLMES: And thus, the particular brand of Turkish cigarette favored by Lord Balfour eliminates him as a suspect, as well. And so, logic compels me to positively identify the countess’ murderer as… YOU, Sir Montby!
[The gathered crowd gasps. Montby puffs himself up to refute the charge.]
MONTBY: Me? I say! How could you assert such a thing?
HOLMES: Elementary, my dear Montby. That’s her head you’re still holding in your hand!
[As the scene dims, the crows oohs and aahs and says, “Oh, the _head_!” and “Of course!” and generally looks impressed.]
HOUSE CALL
[Frank enters from stage left, sporting a ‘plumbers crack’. Tom is standing stage right, looking worried as Frank approaches. Frank points to a spot near Tom.]
FRANK: This the one here?
TOM: Yeah, that’s it.
[Frank mimes removing a tool belt and handing it to Tom.]
FRANK: All right — hold my tool belt, I’ll take a look.
[Frank mimes opening a cabinet low to the ground, lies on his back and slides under.]
FRANK: Lessee… oh, yep, I got it. That’s it right there. Hey, can you hand me the pipe wrench there?
[Tom mimes passing a wrench from the tool belt. Frank mimes taking it and fiddling with something where he’s working.]
FRANK: Good, good. Now the hose cutter.
[Tom mimes passing a hose cutter to Frank, who mimes cutting a hose.]
FRANK: Yep, and the roll of duct tape in the pocket.
[Tom mimes passing it; Frank mimes wrapping something with it.
Frank shimmies out from under the ‘cabinet’ and stands to face Tom.]
FRANK: Well, you’re all set, Mac. [He extends his arms toward Tom, as though cradling a baby.] Congratulations, it’s a girl!
BIRDSEYE DELIGHT
[Fred stands center stage, excitedly cheering and miming holding something in his right hand.]
FRED: All right, let’s go! C’mon, Birdseye Delight! You can do it! Come on around, now! Here we go! Birdseye Delight! Yessir! Bring it home! Don’t fail me now, Birdseye Delight! Aw, yeah! Rounding the corner, now! Come on, baby, hit the finish…
[A microwave oven bell dings. Fred mimes opening the door, taking out a bowl, and eating it with the fork in his hand.]
(Did I mention that tomorrow’s are better? No?
And did I promise they’ll be better? No?
Good.)
Permalink | No CommentsToday, I have no tales for you. Only announcements. And an audio-visual presentation.
Those of you who choose to skip the AV show can sit quietly with your heads on your desks. See if I care.
First, I haven’t cross-talked here for a while about the Zolton Does Amazon series I write over on ZuG.com, but with yesterday’s edition — Terms of Enbeerment, for the brave among you — the series has turned precisely one year old. There are over 100 live Amazon reviews attached to the pieces, mostly positive Amazon shopper feedback, a few bewildered comments and some of the scariest pictures you’ll see this side of a Bavarian bikini zombie flick trailer.
(Coincidentally, since first mentioning the series here back in February, I’ve made exactly 100 posts here as well. It’s like circles within circles or something. Eerie.)
“No, you can’t have that minute of your life back. And yes, I really do own twelve thousand striped rugbies.”
Speaking of trailers, I also mentioned (back in May) that my old comedic friends Jenn and Andrea invited me to play a part in their latest short film project. I also said — and I have it in pixels and white, right here — that if the short were ever to become available online, I’d link over to it posthaste.
The short is not available online. Not yet.
But the trailer for the short — yes, a trailer, because these people are serious, yo — is now on YouTube. And also, right here. Please cast your peepers onto the teaser for Viral Video:
No, you can’t have that minute of your life back. And yes, I really do own twelve thousand striped rugbies.
(And the dress shirt and tie you can see briefly at the 0:35 mark. Wanna see more of that hot action? Stay tuned for the full film, after it’s been laughed out of a few local film festivals.
“Laughed out” good, or “laughed out” bad, I have no idea. Only time and my natty wardrobe will tell.)
While we’re at it, this seems like a good time to remind you that the hilarious essay collection Mug of Woe (co-edited by Jenn, as well) will be hitting shelves — read: Amazon virtual shelving facsimiles — next week. Have a gander at the Foreword for more details and pulse-racing excitement.
(I believe my contribution is in the ‘Woefully Awkward’ section. Probably, at least, if ninety percent of my waking life is anything to go by.)
And that’s about it for the announcements. The cafeteria will be serving those nasty cardboard pizza squares and a vegetable medley, and don’t forget your dioramas depicting the development of the Cyrillic alphabet in 10th century Bulgaria for the Terminally Obscure Social Studies Fair. Pleasant day, children!
Permalink | No Comments