(I neglected to report in my previous post the appearance of the latest Zolton Does Amazon piece over at ZuG.com. But if you’re still basking in the sweaty afterglow of Valentine’s Day goodness, then hop on over to read B-Minus Valentine to find out what you should have done this time around.
Or what you should never have considered for even a moment, assuming you enjoy sleeping within fourteen feet of your wife.
Some people lead by example. I take goofy pictures of myself. Go see. I’ll wait. It’s all good.)
So I may have mentioned — and yeah, I did — that I started a new job in January. Overall, it’s going very well — the people are great, the work is interesting, the commute is a breeze. Yep, it’s all unicorn parades and fluffy bunny jamborees over there at the new office. Perfect as a peach. There’s not one thing I’d change.
Well. In a matter of speaking.
I mean, I wouldn’t change any big things. The big things are all good.
I suppose if someone were to put a gun to my head — or one of those fluffy jamboree bunnies, because I am totally allergic to those — and make me point out one thing that feels just ever so slightly less-than-right about the new office space… well, it would be good to have that one thing in mind, right? Just in case? You don’t want to be racking your brain for some nitpicky little nuisance when there’s a glock pressed to your temple. Or a fuzzy lop, for that matter.
So, here’s the thing. My office has a sign. This sign reads, and I quote:
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn’t be called research.”
— Albert Einstein
It’s a nice sign, on an attractive block of wood and with solid, clear lettering. I’ve got no beef with the construction of the sign. It’s top quality.
“If we accidentally run a few cattle off a cliff, or set some buffalo on fire, we’ll work on getting it right next time.”
Neither do I have a problem with the sentiment. We’re a small company doing, in fact, research. Scientific research, even. Not quite the kind that Einstein rolled around in his beardy little head — we’re closer to Scrubs than Big Bang Theory around here — but the message in the sign is applicable, appropriate, and frankly appreciated.
After all, we’re not going to get everything right the first time. Some of this in uncharted territory. It’s comforting to know that a brain the size of Einstein’s recognized that, and that the higher-ups at the company recognize him recognizing it. We’re blazing trails as best we can. If we accidentally run a few cattle off a cliff, or set some buffalo on fire, we’ll work on getting it right next time. That’s how the West was… uh, overrun and exploited and filled with smoky buffalo carcasses.
It’s possible I lost a little steam near the end of that analogy. Moving right along.
The point is, I don’t have anything against the sign itself. I like the sign, and I like that the sign is hung in our office. There is zero problem with the sign.
The problem is where the sign is hung. It’s not in the entryway, where it might inspire us daily. Not in the foyer, by the break room, nor near the door to one of the labs. Instead? It’s hung on the mens’ room door.
Call me oversensitive to context, but that same message has a very different meaning in a laboratory setting than it does when you’re about to enter a room possibly filled with several men, disturbing smells and running water, and there’s a fifty-fifty chance you’re going to be taking your pants down.
In the bathroom, I want to know what I’m doing. And I don’t want to call it ‘research‘. I don’t care if there’s a crowd, or I’m by myself. I’d like to keep my ‘experimentation’ away from toilets, urinal cakes and automatic hand dryers, thank you so very much indeed.
So this sign, which I’d enjoy just about anywhere else in the environment, now gives me a little jolt of morbid anxiety every time I need to pee. It’s unfortunate, but eventually it got me thinking — why are the women getting off so easily? Why don’t they have some twisted-up misconstruable message on the door to their ladypart facilities?
And then it struck me: Maybe they do.
You see, the ladies’ room door is past the mens’, in a little alcove past the back hallway. There’s no reason to head in that direction unless you’re going to the ladies’ room — so I’d never been that way, or even seen the door. I realized that I actually didn’t know what the female population was dealing with, vis a vis bathroom door signage. Surely, it couldn’t be worse than ours. But I decided to find out.
And so, on Sunday afternoon I drove to the office while no one was around to sneak a peek at the womens’ bathroom door.
(Because that’s totally what normal people do on their day off from work. It’s not “weird”.
No, you shut up.)
I badged myself through the door, slunk down the hallway and approached the ladies’ room, wary for any stray weekend employees who might be in the vicinity. With the coast clear, I crept onward to my goal — and on reaching the door, I saw a mounted plaque very similar to the one on the boys’ room entrance. Only this one read:
“There are no rules here. We’re trying to accomplish something.”
— Thomas Edison
Oh sweet cranky jesus. I said it couldn’t be worse — and I was wrong. Dead wrong.
We might be doing ‘research’ in our bathroom over there, but at least we have rules! What’s a restroom without any rules at all? I don’t know. Are there sandboxes where the stalls should be? Do they have a moonbounce in there? Is it something out of Caligula?
I have no idea. But I’m glad I only made it as far as the door. And now I understand why the janitors go in there at night with power washers, putty knives and hazmat suits.
So I guess I’m happier with our mens’ bathroom, after all. I still don’t agree with the sign being there. And I keep my ‘research’ in that room to a bare-bottomed minimum. But at least we have rules. Every bathroom needs rules, man. Those girls are just crazy.
Permalink | No CommentsI would not characterize my wife as ‘forgetful’.
(Because trust me, if I did, she’d never forget that. Or let me, either.)
But I will say this, and she’d surely agree: If you were betting on who would, for instance, leave their phone accidentally at home on a workday, or forget their ID on the way to a bar, or buzz the doorbell frantically at some ungodly-early hour of the morning because they’d walked the dog without grabbing their keys — again, and sometimes twice in the same fricking week — the safe money’s on her. Every time.
Again, she doesn’t do these things often, in the grand scheme of things. I’m the oddball, actually — because I almost never have such lapses. I can think of one time I locked myself out of the house in the last dozen years, and maybe two or three days I walked out without my phone. She could do the same in a month, maybe less.
It’s shocking, I know. I wear the goofball pants in this family; if anyone should be marching out the door without keys or wallet or pants, it ought to be me. But no.
“I wear the goofball pants in this family; if anyone should be marching out the door without keys or wallet or pants, it ought to be me.”
I tell you that to tell you this: My wife is out of town this weekend. Along with, so far as I know, her keys, wallet, phone and ID. And pants. But I’m holding down the fort here until Monday night — just me and the mutt.
As I was walking said mutt this morning, I ran into one of our upstairs neighbors. We have the bottom unit in a three-story brownstone; this lady lives on the third floor. We exchanged greetings and she cheerfully offered:
‘Looks like you guys have the place to yourselves this weekend. The second floor’s already gone, and we’re getting out of here by noon.‘
Well, that’s different. It’s one thing to be missusless for a few days. But now the entire building is being vacated? What, are we fumigating the place for pests?
(Probably. I bet I’m the pest. Am I the pest? I bet I am.)
So now the persnickety pooch and I have the run of the whole structure for the next forty-eight hours or so. No one here to make any noise, or hear our noise, or run into in the entryway or down in the basement. Just me and the dog. Nobody else. All alone in the building.
You know what this means, of course.
This — this — is the weekend when I finally lock myself out of the house.
Let’s face it, it’s almost guaranteed. There’s no safety net. No wife coming home from work, or neighbors upstairs to buzz me in. If I step out the door without keys right now, I’m not getting back in until Monday night. And I could starve by then. All the nacho fixins are inside the condo.
(Come to think of it, I wouldn’t get back in the house until Tuesday sometime. Because I’m supposed to pick my wife up at the airport on Monday night — and if she has to take a cab home, I might as well sleep on the front walk, anyway. At least the porch steps won’t kick me in the back while I sleep.)
The point being, this is undoubtedly the least convenient time possible to find myself locked out of the house. Which is why it’s also the overwhelmingly most likely time to occur. That’s how life happens — when you’re not looking, and you have no backup plans. Also, possibly when you’re not wearing any pants.
So if you don’t hear from me for a few days — or you see some hungry dork in his underwear walking a dog outside your window this weekend — just know that the inevitable happened. And that there’s an entirely empty building nearby with all my stuff and no people in it.
Also, nacho fixins. Because life is cruel that way.
Permalink | No CommentsYou’ll forgive me, I hope, for being rather scarce this week.
(Or you’ll forgive me for bothering to show up again. Either’s good. Reader’s choice.)
In my defense, I’ve been doing a fair bit of writing for other purposes — including a new Zolton Does Amazon piece that’ll show up over on ZuG.com in the next day or two. So keep your wish list peeled for that.
“I slapped a guy with his own mullet.”
In the meantime, I’m pretty pooped. Happily, there’s one piece I can share with you right now — a new sketch that I pitched this weekend for the next Ruckus show coming up in April at ImprovBoston. Maybe you’ll see it there. Or maybe you’ll see one of my other sketches there. Or maybe you won’t; when I find out, I’ll let you know.
In the meantime, it’s good to be writing sketches again. And also, having writing projects do double-duty as posts here. That gets me to bed early tonight. I knew this writing thing would work out for me some day. G’night, kids — enjoy!
FACT CHECK
[KATE sits at a restaurant table. On one side is STEVE, busily typing on a laptop. TED approaches opposite.]
TED: Hi… Kate?
KATE: Yes, hi! Ted?
TED: Yep. Wow, you’re even prettier in person.
KATE: Aw, you’re sweet. Please, sit down.
[Ted sits and looks at Steve, puzzled.]
TED: And this is…?
KATE: Oh, that’s just Steve. He’s my fact checker.
TED: Your fact… checker?
KATE: Oh, he’s fine. Just pretend he’s not even here, Ted. Is that short for ‘Theodore’, by the way?
[Ted nods. Steve types.]
KATE: And it’s Garrett with two ‘t’s?
[Ted nods. Steve types some more.]
KATE: Middle initial?
TED: Uh… ‘J’.
[Steve types, stops, and gives a thumbs-up to Kate.]
KATE: Great! So, Ted — your profile says you’re from Chicago?
TED: Yeah, that’s right.
[Steve types a bit, looks at Kate and shakes his head ‘no’. Kate looks at Ted meaningfully.]
TED: Well… we were in the suburbs of Chicago.
[Steve shakes his head again.]
TED: All right. Technically, it was Bloomington, Indiana. But I went to Chicago on a field trip once.
[Steve types, gives Ted a ‘Really?’ look.]
TED: Well, I was supposed to go. I couldn’t find my permission slip. (to Steve) Happy?
[Steve shrugs. Kate smiles sweetly at Ted.]
KATE: And I understand you work in a hospital. That must be really tough.
TED: It’s a challenge, sure. But very rewarding.
KATE: So, are you a doctor?
[Ted looks at Steve nervously. Steve types.]
TED: Um, not as such. But I am saving lives, in a way.
KATE: You mean, like a nurse?
[Steve gives a thumbs-down.]
TED: I’m a… different sort of healthcare professional.
KATE: A radiologist? A phlebotomist? Candy striper?
[Steve tilts the laptop over to Kate, who reads.]
KATE: A… clown? Like, you work in the sick kids’ ward?
[Steve types and peers over the laptop at Ted.]
TED: Actually, it’s geriatrics. They… dress me up like Howdy Doody and make me play pinochle.
KATE: I see. So, did you go to school for that?
[Steve types furiously through the next exchange, pausing occasionally to ‘check’ Ted into honesty.]
TED: Uh, not… exactly.
KATE: Well, where did you go to school?
TED: Penn. …sylvannia School of Beauty. …Altoona Campus. …Part time. …And I got thrown out.
KATE: So the hospital job?
TED: Community service. I slapped a guy with his own mullet.
KATE: Wow. That’s… wow.
TED: Yeah. Look, I should go. I’m sorry to waste your time.
KATE: Wait, don’t leave. This is the best date I’ve ever had!
TED: Wait… really?
KATE: Well, yeah. You’re the first guy I’ve met who hasn’t punched Steve in the face, or had a secret porn addiction. Or both. C’mon, let’s get out of here.
TED: Uh… okay?
KATE: But no funny business. I don’t believe in sex before marriage.
[Steve types, and clears his throat meaningfully.]
KATE: Before a committed relationship, then.
[Steve *AHEM*s again.]
KATE: Fifth date. …Third date? All right, FINE — pour a few martinis in me, and we’ll see what happens. Happy?
[Steve shrugs.]
TED: Well, I’m not saying anything will happen. But if it does? Let’s just say you won’t be disappointed.
[Ted and Kate turn to Steve, who types away, checks his screen, nods and gives a thumbs-up. Ted and Kate hug and squeal with delight.]
Permalink | No CommentsSomewhere along the winding twisty path of life, I lost my superstitious nature. I’m not sure when it happened, exactly, or how, but at some point I stopped believing in luck, fate, karma, curses, hexes, voodoo and the state Moneyball Lotto.
Looking back, it all makes sense now. Belief in those sorts of things implies faith in some sort of universal order — a cosmic cause-and-effect, what-goes-around-comes-around, I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I perpetual game of tallying the scores between every creature, concept and corporation and making sure it all comes out even. What’s more, it suggests some level of control — or at least a meek influence — over this wildly elaborate and grotesquely Goldbergesque scheme of punishment and reward, simply by throwing salt over your shoulder or avoiding breaking a mirror.
Frankly, I think it’s much simpler than that. Four decades on the planet have taught me that shit falls apart, often at the least convenient time. The cosmos isn’t looking out for me, or “out to get me”; that’s just what it does. And a decade-plus each of marriage and dog ownership have shown me that I have no “control” to speak of. I can keep my fingers crossed for days on end; it won’t change my luck. It might give me arthritis, but that’s not luck. That’s arthritis.
You might think it sad to have put aside such a whimsical slice of human existence. Perhaps it is — but it’s also pretty damned liberating. There’s so much less to worry about, once you realize there’s nothing much you can do about most of what used to worry you. When “everything happens for a reason“, it’s worth scurrying around to find those reasons, to influence them, to understand their subtle implications.
When you move on to “shit happens“, shit just happens. Maybe you have some say in it, and probably you don’t. And most probably, you’ll never see it coming in quite the way you thought you would.
So why ponder such abstractions tonight? As usual, it’s a symptom of grief. Many people tend to wax philosophical when dealing with loss, and I’m no different. It’s how we cope with something unpleasant — like, say, when our team has just lost the Super Bowl. Just for instance. Not that I’m bitter. I’m just saying. Goddammit.
Of course, other people have different ways of coping. Take my wife, for instance. She might have something more visceral, more confrontational in mind. Like earlier tonight, when she noticed — while I changed from my “I’m a big boy” work clothes into some comfy sweats — that I was wearing my referee boxers recently mentioned in this space. She huffed, and said:
“I’m no magician or shaman or dude who can see the matrix and fly like sunglassed Superman and yank bullets out of PVC-clad hotties’ boobs.”
‘Well, maybe if you’d worn your football panties on Sunday, we’d have won that game!‘
Now, I don’t think she was being literal. My wife is not so much the superstitious sort, either.
(She couldn’t be, really. The girl owned a black cat for most the years she was growing up. Unless she took some ridiculously circuitous Family Circle route to the bathroom every morning, she was crossing its path. Constantly.
And look how it turned out for her — she’s grown up just fine, with a good job, good friends, and… uh, married to me.
Okay, so fine. Maybe she ought to be just a little superstitious. Shaddup.)
I think she was just venting her frustration in a game that we both invested a lot of time and cheering and three bowls of bean dip in. But it did come off a bit aggressive.
(Though to be fair, it also represented a new plateau in our relationship. It might well be the first time that she saw me wearing a pair of underpants on a Tuesday and just assumed that I hadn’t also worn them on Sunday.
Now, that’s love, baby. Or some reasonable facsimile thereof.)
I patiently explained my feelings on most of the above to her. What I wear, I said, or how I act or think or feel or hope, has no bearing on a sporting event happening hundreds of miles away. I’m no magician or shaman or dude who can see the matrix and fly like sunglassed Superman and yank bullets out of PVC-clad hotties’ boobs.
And anyway, the day my choice of underwear can influence the activities of fifty-three men six states away is the day I want off this ride. Because it’s gone seriously, seriously weird.
So we agreed to disagree — both about whose fault our team’s loss was and about how to go about moving on. I’m trying to forget it ever happened. She’s snarking about my underwear. By the time football season rolls around again, we’ll probably be ready for another roller coaster ride. And next Super Bowl Sunday, I’ll be sure to wear the correct underwear.
Which is the ones with the little Matrix characters on it. They may not help our team win, but I’ll have the snazziest ‘panties’ at the party, at least. Call me superstitious, but that’s got to help me ‘get lucky’ eventually, right?
…Right?!?
Permalink | No Comments(For you Super Bowl party hosts, my latest Zolton Does Amazon piece over at ZuG, Practice Makes Party, might be just the bash-planning guide you’re looking for.
Unless you’re afraid to look like a Smurf. Or you don’t like kosher salsa. Or vibrating cocktail weenies.
Oh, come on. You have to go look now. How could you not?)
It’s a month or so belated, but I’d like to publicly thank my old workmates for the thoughtful — and delicious — parting gift they bought me when I left at the end of December. They were kind enough to pitch in together to make me a member of a Beer of the Month Club. Because they know that the way to a man’s heart is, of course, through his liver.
“They’re tough to find, barely known and obscure to all but the most thorough brewficionados.”
(Of course, to get to just about anything in there these days, you’ve got to go through a bit of liver. That shit is everywhere by now. The way to this man’s prostate is probably also through the liver, but we don’t need anyone navigating that particular route on the map.
And thank goodness it didn’t come into play in the gift selection. Or the going-away party. Eep.)
This is not just any Beer of the Month Club, though. Oh, no, Augustus — this is the Rare Been or the Month Club. These are brews that you won’t likely find on your local package store shelf, Liquor Barn sale rack, or watering hole drink menu. They’re tough to find, barely known and obscure to all but the most thorough brewficionados. And why is that?
Because they’re freaking WEIRD.
Now, don’t get me wrong — that’s not a bad thing. For me, in fact, that’s a very good thing. I’m no suds expert. I know what I like, and it’s helpful if a few favorites aren’t that hard to track down on a thirsty Saturday night. Or Friday evening. Or for that matter, lunchtime on a Tuesday.
But those favorites are not the mass-produced muted-flavor brews that you see in your grocery store displays and catchy Super Bowl ads.
(Except Guinness. I make an exception for Guinness. We have… history.)
So I am a bit of a beer snob, I suppose. And these ‘rare’ beers are a snobbyists hopped dream. Love ’em or hate ’em, these bottles were evidently picked to be as crazy-eyed different from ‘regular beer’ as possible. The first shipment came a few days ago, and here’s what was in it:
Bottle #1: A beer made in the south of France — where, like, four people live who aren’t making wine or snooting around the fancy beaches. And one of those people decided to brew his own beer, apparently.
Only, he or she doesn’t actually drink beer, because whoever whipped up this concoction can’t possibly know about the sorts of things that people think pair well with beer, and which don’t. This beer is made with nougat. NOUGAT. Actual, honest to Betsy, in-your-Snickers NOUGAT.
Does it taste like nougat? Oh, yeah. Nougat and beer. The most natural and obvious taste pairing since tuna fish and Pudding Pops. It was right there in front of us the whole time; it just took six hundred years and some floppy French wine flunky to clue us in to the pairing.
The beer tastes approximately like you’d think beer and nougat together in your mouth would taste — only maybe sixty percent better. By the time I could see the bottom of my glass, I was enjoying the sweetness — but also pretty happy they only sent one bottle. I think I prefer my nougat wrapped in chocolate and buried under some indeterminate number of Musketeers.
Grade: B-
Bottle #2: This beer was Belgian, for which it gets full credit. Because let’s face it — what the hell is there to do in Belglandia other than make beer, drink beer, drink more beer and curse the day you met beer in the first place? It’s not like they have a Planet Hollywood or anything.
So an awful lot of beers come from Belgium, and many are quite good. This one was a Christmas beer — apparently Sinterklaas digs him some brewskis — and just the oddest bout of doodad brewing a drunken bunch of near-Frenchmen could come up with.
First, as I mentioned — it’s a Christmas beer. You’d expect something dark and rich, like a porter or stout, to stave off the wintertime cold.
Nope. It’s an IPA.
So maybe you’d guess it’s brewed with traditional Christmas flavors, like candy canes or cinnamon or North Pole frozen elf sweat.
Sort of. Try ‘pine needles’ and ‘ginger’. Because those are two things you’ve probably always wanted to pour down your throat together. I know I have.
Luckily — for me, at least, since none of us is ever likely to see such a beer again — the brewers didn’t go overboard with the yuletide add-ons. They shook the old Christmas wand over the brew no more than twice, leaving only subtle hints of extra flavors. Happily, when I say that this beer was like “Christmas in January”, it’s only because I’m sitting here drinking on a Thursday night, and not because I feel like an evergreen forest full of gingers just got shoved down my gullet.
I don’t like my hops over-sullied. And these folks didn’t. Nice Belgianing, smart people.
Grade: B+
So that’s the first batch of rare ‘n’ weird beers. I got a second boxful last night. Haven’t opened them yet, so I don’t know precisely what sort of crimes against simple Reinheitsgebot brewing they represent. Crabcake ales or squid ink porters or lagers infused with potpourri? No idea.
But one thing’s for sure — they’re not going to be Coors or Bud Light or Old Milwaukee’s Best or another of their ilk. And that? That makes them delicious.
Permalink | 1 Comment