I could fairly be accused of “oversharing” around these parts sometimes. But I assure you — no matter how it seems — I don’t share absolutely everything.
Not right away, at least. And I can prove it. By sharing.
A few months ago, I wrote a post describing my weekend. A weekend much like this one, filled with mixups and awkward conversations and unwanted deodorant. As usual.
If you skip to the “Saturday” section of that post, you’ll see that I described my embarrassment at being the only person in my sketch writing class, seemingly, who knew the ‘alternate’ definition of the word Santorum.
(This was several months ago, remember. Maybe before all the political jibberjabber leading up to election circus time. So maybe they just hadn’t heard yet. Or maybe they don’t read the internet. Some of them were old. So it’s possible.)
In short, during a writing exercise I had a story topic passed to me — or thought it was the topic passed to me, when it really wasn’t, quite so much — that read:
“I actually held something back that might have been squirmy and uncomfortable, and you should count yourselves lucky that I do, apparently, have some sort of line I choose not to cross.”
“No Comment From Santorum Camp”
Now, I don’t give half a bouncing bald eagle’s butt about politics — but I do know about the Santorum website, and why it exists, and that seemed like fun. So in the exercise, I wrote something about that.
And received a circle of open-mouthed blank stares from the apparently do-gooding Amish never-heard-of-it crowd in the room. In my October post about it, all I said about my quick-writ story was:
“I decided to write a news story about a group of sex researchers — from “the Netherlands, Las Vegas and a Greyhound station in lower Manhattan” — who’d come up with a completely new sexual byproduct, “never before oozed”. And they piggy-backed on the other, original, beknownst-to-all Santorum campaign, also naming their love juice after the plucky lawmaker.”
That’s all I said. I could have shared the whole thing. Oh, yes. But I didn’t. I actually held something back that might have been squirmy and uncomfortable, and you should count yourselves lucky that I do, apparently, have some sort of line I choose not to cross.
Or rather, you should count your past self lucky, if he or she was reading in October, because I just found the piece of paper on which I wrote that monstrosity. I’ve got nothing else to write today. And that ‘line’ I had? Miles behind me.
So if you’re feeling political — or just Santorumantic — please to be enjoying last fall’s impromptu scribbled faux news bit entitled:
No Comment from Santorum Camp
Lawmaker Rick Santorum, long hounded by a campaign to associate his name in online searches with a particularly “indelicate” sexual references, today has a new challenge to face.
Sex researchers in the Netherlands, Las Vegas and a Greyhound station in lower Manhattan jointly announced today an entirely new, never-before-oozed product of sexual activity. And they’ve named it up front — so to speak — after Santorum.
“We’re very excited,” said researcher and part-time burlesque fluffer Joey “Double Joints” Van Park. “It took us months to work this out. We flew in Kama Sutra experts, rhythmic gymnasts, a guy with twelve fingers and a case of anchovies, and it finally all came together. We put in a lot of work, and now, there’s a new “Santorum”.
Efforts are already underway to link the Senator to this new and presumably disgusting substance. A spokesman for the original campaign to associate the senator with bodily fluids said in a press conference that the recent developments represented a “foul and vicious attack” on Santorum, the man. As opposed to Santorum, the excretion.
When asked to explain his puzzling comment, the spokesman clarified, saying he’d meant a foul and viscous attack, which had his group’s full support and approval. “There is plenty of room,” he added, “for all manner of sexual byproducts in Santorum. The more, the merrier.”
When contacted, a member of the Santorum camp replied, “No comment,” adding, “Frankly, he doesn’t even like anchovies.”
Permalink | 2 Comments(The ‘Eek!Cards’ explan.)
Permalink | No Comments(The ‘Eek!Cards’ explan.)
Permalink | No CommentsSome questions are virtually self-evident, with the answer scarcely requiring an explanation. Other questions… not so much.
When my wife came home from work tonight, she found me sitting in the middle of the kitchen floor with the rotating tray from the microwave on my lap, poking with a toothpick at bits of food embedded in a mound of molten blue plastic. In response, she had several questions. Starting with:
‘What in god’s name are you doing this time?‘
(Kids, you know you’re leading a full life when the questions end with ‘-this time?‘ That’s a sure sign you’ve made it. Your misadventures are no longer simply uncommon — at that stage, the questions merely end with ‘-now?‘ — but they’ve moved into the realm of the fully expected. It’s an accomplishment. Envy me.)
Luckily, this was one of those self-evident questions. So I was prepared:
‘I’m sitting in the middle of the kitchen with the rotating microwave tray, poking at food and plastic with this toothpick. Clearly.‘
“Frankly, it looked like Boozy Smurf had just upchucked on my lap.”
I found a pea, speared it and popped it in my mouth. She lingered, as though she were waiting for something more. Maybe I should have offered her the pea. She tried again.
‘No… but… well, why are you sitting in the middle of the kitchen floor?‘
Another softball, as plain as day.
‘Because I didn’t want to get this mess on the couch. This seemed cleaner.‘
Indeed, even as I spoke the dog was snurfling up little bits of rice that I’d missed from around my legs. The system was obviously working.
‘Well, what is that mess, anyway?‘
A question with a less obvious answer, I had to give her that. Frankly, it looked like Boozy Smurf had just upchucked on my lap. But that couldn’t have happened, of course. Boozy’s been off the sauce for three years now.
Also, Smurfs aren’t real. There’s also that.
‘This mess is mostly leftover Chinese food, but also quite a bit melted disposable plastic plate.‘
She drifted back into the easy questions.
‘Did you melt it in the microwave?‘
Well, I didn’t drop it into the fires of fricking Mordor, now did I, sister?
‘Yup.‘
‘Okay, why did you melt it in the microwave?‘
‘I needed a plate for dinner. It seemed sturdy. Ish.‘
‘Was it labeled microwave-safe?‘
Okay, even she knew the answer to that one. I could see it in her one untwitching eye.
‘It’s hard to tell now, what with the melting and recongealing onto the rotator tray. But I’d venture to guess that no, it probably was not labeled microwave-safe.‘
‘Well, why did you use that, anyway? We have real plates.‘
‘They were all dirty, so I started the dishwasher. Then I needed a plate.‘
‘You could have stopped the dishwasher.‘
‘You don’t just stop a dishwasher. That’s madness.‘
‘You could have kept one plate out, and washed it in the sink.‘
‘But we have a dishwasher. That’s what it’s for.‘
We looked at each other momentarily, trying to imagine what strange alien world the other had recently hatched from. I stabbed a baby shrimp and ate it; she resumed the interrogation.
‘That plastic stinks. Why didn’t you just throw that away and heat up more?‘
‘Then you wouldn’t have any. I didn’t want to be rude.‘
‘And why are you picking at it with a toothpick?‘
‘Well, partly to avoid the bits of plastic. But mostly, the obvious.‘
She gave me a look that was both questioning and exasperated. My wife’s face can be pretty expressive, when you get right down to it. I think she must practice crinkling her nose in the mirror after I go to bed. This look plainly said, ‘What obvious, dummy?‘
I pointed to the dishwasher, making an expression of my own meant to signal that all of the forks were also dirty and so my hands were clearly tied. Maybe it did. Maybe it signaled I was choking on a baby shrimp. I’m not so good at these non-verbal things.
She sighed, and apparently felt the need to tally up the sum of what she’d learned. I stabbed at a bit of what might have once been a dumpling and nodded in agreement.
‘So let me get this straight. You’re sitting there in the middle of the floor poking stinking melted leftovers with a toothpick because you don’t want to get the couch dirty, we have no clean plates, you can’t wash one yourself, all the forks are in the dishwasher, you don’t want to be ‘rude’, and you think because a plate looks ‘sturdy’, it can withstand four hundred degrees of heat in the microwave?‘
I munched the purported dumpling thoughtfully before replying.
‘Sturdy-ish. But otherwise, yes. It’s pretty simple, really.‘
‘Unbelievable. Just completely un-freaking-believable. Fine. I just have one more question, then.‘
Nope, not a dumpling. Either a soggy water chestnut or a semi-petrified slab of Hunan chicken. That mystery solved, I was ready for my sweetie’s final query.
‘Shoot.‘
‘I see we have glasses left in the cupboard. So why on earth are you sitting down there with a sippy cup?‘
Ah, that’s my snookums — end me on an easy one.
‘Well, come on — Flintstones. I mean, duh, right?‘
Like I said. Some answers are self-evident.
Permalink | No Comments(The ‘Eek!Cards’ explan.)
Yo, readers!
The real wordy action tonight is over at ZuG.com, where my latest Zolton-Who-Used-to-Do-Amazon-But-Now-Does-Facebook-Instead joint is up and about: Zolton’s Facebook Follies: Secrets and Lyes. Check it!
Permalink | 1 Comment