Last night, I cleaned out my closet, looking to get rid of old clothes. I thought I could take a wardrobe inventory, make room for new togs, maybe donate some clothes to the needier and nakeder than myself. A little closet cleanout seemed like just the ticket.
Yeah. I wouldn’t recommend it.
Now there’s four hours of my life I’ll never have back, and at least three nightmare revelations made during this cockamamie clothing chore. Here are the ones I haven’t repressed yet:
1. I used to wear some really, really stupid clothes.
I don’t take a lot of pictures. And I have a memory like a sieve made from Swiss cheese and flimsy alibis. So I’m not often reminded of the godawful ugly horrors of wardrobes past. Until, of course, I go digging in the back of the closet and find them.
” I’m pretty sure that growing a midlife spare tire doesn’t count as ‘natural male enhancement”
And find them I did. Big lapels, overly-wide belts, skinny ties, too-short shorts — at the bottom of every pile was waiting one of those cringeworthy, ‘Holy jeebus, I actually wore that?‘ moments.
I thankfully didn’t have a puffy pirate shirt in the back of the closet. But I had just about everything else. And it all went into one huge embarrassing stack of crap in the middle of the floor. We’ll get back to that, right after:
2. There’s more of me than there used to be.
And not in any of the places that might be useful, either. I’m pretty sure that growing a midlife spare tire doesn’t count as ‘natural male enhancement’. Not the way you might be thinking, at least. Perv.
Of course, that meant that of the ‘normal’ garments I had left over after the Great Crappy Clothes Cull of ’09 above, many of them are now entirely useless to me. Unless I need a new long-sleeved hanky, or a dishcloth made from old rugbies. Maybe the dog can wear my old Levis; I sure as hell can’t get into them any more.
Still, I told myself, we just squeezed through the holiday season. I’ve been stuffed full of food in six different states over the past two weeks, like some sort of bus-trekking Butterball. So if there are clothes that don’t quite fit in early January, they could conceivably shimmy on by, say, spring. Assuming I don’t have any Easter eggs or marshmallow bunnies.
Or summer. Provided we’re not invited to any cookouts.
Fall, perhaps. Just so long as a law is passed by then outlawing all forms of Halloween candy.
Would you believe winter? I can envision a three-day period in mid-November when I could totally squish myself into some of those clothes before Thanksgiving turkey time rolls around. Yeah. Let’s go with that.
So that left me with a conundrum. For each of my GOUSes (that’s Garment Of Unguessable Size, of course), I had a procedure: try it on — or as close to ‘on’ as I could manage; take a mental note of how ridiculously badly it fits, how drafty I feel and how hard I’m breathing in that condition; then decide whether the thing is ‘wearable’, ‘near-wearable’, or ‘unfit-even-for-Carnivale’.
The worst part of answering that question was the criteria. I figured that if I could slip a shirt on or fully button and zip a pair of pants without holding my breath, spraining a muscle or involving a shoehorn in any way, then it was ‘wearable’. I think that happened twice.
‘Near-wearable’ meant that I could manage to get the shirt on, or zip the pants up, but there was a non-zero level of… um, displacement of bodily substance caused by the effort. Quite a few of the clothes fell into this category, though I was a bit cavalier with my definition of ‘displacement’. I hiked up one particular pair of pants with some difficulty, and had an option — I could either button them up, or I could continue to see past my nipples. In my book, that qualifies as ‘displacement’.
(Not to mention quite drafty. For a short while, I could have cut glass directly over my head. I can see where that could come in handy some day.)
Then there were the clothes that simply laughed at me as I attempted to try them on. The khakis that made it halfway up my thighs. The polo that doubled briefly as an up-to-the-elbows straitjacket. And don’t get me started on the long johns. If I cut the crotch out of those things, I might have a pair of really warm knee-high socks. Otherwise, they’re a disaster.
More than half of my ‘fit or no fit’ clothes wound up as unwearable. And the ‘no-go’ pile grew ever larger. Which brings us to the final nightmare:
3. Staring at asses all night is just dandy — unless it’s your own.
Not that I was actually staring at my own ass, of course. I couldn’t do that with a rope and pulley system, some strategically placed mirrors and a month of yoga classes.
What I did do all night, though, was examine each and every one of those won’t-or-can’t-wear pieces of clothing to decide whether it was suitable for donation, or should be chucked out with the week’s newspapers and banana peels. And the ‘normal’ wear and tear I found on some of those garments was disturbing, to say the least.
Holey socks is one thing. I’m a tall guy, and I’ve been blessed with long and powerful toes. They can probably crack walnuts or do chinups or something. So to see that they’ve punched holes in a few pairs of flimsy cotton socks came as no shock. Those toes of mine — always up to something. And the abused socks went into the trash pile.
Likewise, the knees of a few pairs of jeans were worn through — no surprise there, either. With all the time I spend begging for forgiveness, crawling back to people and throwing myself on the mercy of various institutions, it’s a wonder I have knees left in any pants at all. So the kneed-through pairs of pants got tossed.
Then I checked the ones that were left. And noticed that some of the more ‘lived-in’ pairs were showing some other signs of fraying — at the pants cuffs, and around the pockets.
And yes, in the ass.
So I spent the better (hah!) part of an hour staring at the asses of my old and unwanted jeans, trying to determine how much butt wear was ‘too much’. Would you want a donated pair of pants that had gotten sort of soft and fuzzy back there? What if there were small holes worn out? Or large holes? How about gaping holes, covered over with ‘Hello, Kitty’ patches and a Cool Whip bowl lid? Seriously, where does one draw the line?
I couldn’t tell. So I trashed them all. And I was getting pretty tired and cranky by that point, so the shirts went, too.
By the end of the ordeal, I definitely had more room in the closet. Hell, I had three shirts and a pair of sweatpants left — I ought to have room in the damned closet. And there was nothing to donate to charity — nothing with intact toes, crotch, knees and ass that wasn’t polka-dotted, leopard-printed or ‘fixed’ with whipped topping packaging, anyway. Even the homeless people don’t want that hanging over their heads. Or clinging to their asscheeks.
Now I guess I have to find a whole new wardrobe. Preferably one comprised of steel-toed sweat socks and assrub-resistant denim jeans. Also, I’ll have to be a bit careful about sizing, or navigation will be a challenge. I’m pretty sure ‘muffin top blindness’ is not a valid defense for a reckless driving charge, for instance.
At least it’s an excuse for a clothes shopping spree, I suppose. And it’d be nice to have some new stuff to wear. I hear they’re doing wonders with puffy pirate shirts these days.
Permalink | 4 CommentsAll of this talk about our recent trip to see one of my wife’s friends get married got me thinking: have I ever actually written anything about our own wedding?
The answer, conveniently enough, is ‘yes’. And this being the weekend, I’ll take the opportunity to simply point you at those posts, and get back to watching football, unpacking and trying desperately to find a clean pair of pants to wear to work tomorrow. In that order. Obviously.
In the meantime, there are two mentions (at least) of my nuptial ceremonies in the 100 Things Posts About Me canon:
#25. I got married when I was twenty-five years old.
#67. The first wedding I ever attended was my own.
“I thought I might screw the whole thing up, or need a ‘cheat sheet’ tucked in my cummerbund to get me through it.”
(Both of the above statements are true, by the way, as amazing as the latter seems to some people. I was a bit afraid that having never seen one, I wouldn’t know what groomly duties I was meant to perform. I thought I might screw the whole thing up, or need a ‘cheat sheet’ tucked in my cummerbund to get me through it. Luckily, I made it through without too much trouble.
Unfortunately, I’ve screwed up my other goal of having the first funeral I attend be my own. I was really hoping to hit a home run on that one, but I’ve already been to two where I wasn’t the guest of honor.
Pity, too. Even as dorky as I am, I don’t think I could have screwed up lying in a casket for a couple of hours. I really didn’t need to see other people pulling it off to get the hang of it.)
While I’m here and we’re waxing about weddings, I might as well point out that the ceremony this weekend is not, in fact, the second that I’ve been to. Between my own blissful hitching and this most recent ball-and-chaining, I’ve attended a few more, maybe a couple of dozen or so. And, it turns out, I’ve mentioned a couple of those in print, too:
June 20th, 2004: What I Learned on My Summer Va-Cape-Tion
November 22nd, 2004: Looks Like Eternity Will Be Nice and Toasty!
October 8th, 2005: Guinness at the Reception? What a Beautiful Ceremony!
And finally, to ensure you don’t feel jilted or left at the blogging altar this weekend, there’s one last wedding-related item I can offer, aptly nestled in the category ‘Weird for the Sake of Weird‘. As you’ll see, if you follow the next link to:
May 12, 2006: Imaginary Catalog: Wedding Cake Figurines
That’s all the nuptial nutball nonsense I can muster for now. A happy — and blissful weekend to all.
Permalink | No CommentsSometimes, I just don’t know whose side to take. Especially when strangers are involved. But especially when the strangers are ‘sharing’. Like this morning, for instance.
My wife and I are in Pennsylvania/Delaware/New Jersey/Nebraska this weekend for a wedding. I planned to wear a black suit to the ceremony. Which was fine, except that my black shoes were still back in my house near Boston, probably walking on all the furniture and eating everything we left in the fridge. You know what they say: ‘When the shoehorn’s away, the wingtips will play’. Something like that.
My brown shoes, which clash more or less completely with the black suit, were here with us. So the missus gave me an option — we venture out in the morning to buy a pair of shoes, or we buy a brown suit. My choice.
(My suggestion of rubbing charcoal or coffee grounds or gunpowder onto my brown shoes to blacken them up was immediately and summarily rejected. Now I just have to hope that she doesn’t open the shoebox and notice that I’d already gotten started on one before I mentioned the idea.
And pray she doesn’t ask for French roast in the morning.)
“I’ve got a newborn at home; he’s got a drinking problem.”
So, we set off in search of black shoes. I’m no fan of shoe shopping, but browsing for a suit is a special slice of searing hell that I save for special occasions. I’m sincerely hoping that my next suit purchase will be made posthumously, when they need something to wrap around me in the casket. And if I can wriggle it into my will to bury me in Syracuse orange, then I won’t even need that one. Either that, or it’s going to be one hell of an ugly suit. That’s okay. I don’t want to be caught dead in a suit, anyway.
Back to the stranger, and my conversational predicament.
We found a shoe store, picked out a suitable pair (she picked; I ‘helped’ — naturally), and took them to the register. There were two girls at the counter, one in her early thirties, maybe, and the other a few years younger. There was a short line of people waiting to check out, so the girls were both working — but also carrying on a conversation as they rung up, packaged, bagged, and receipted.
I couldn’t hear much until we got closer, but eventually picked up that the older girl’s shift was over soon (or already), and her replacement hadn’t arrived yet. She seemed a bit agitated about it — and the other girl was agreeing with her at every turn. Egging her on, in other words. As Older Girl worked herself into a nice foamy lather, my wife and I approached the counter to pay. Older Girl was putting away shoeboxes under the counter and yapping to her friend:
‘I don’t know, but if Gary’s not here in five minutes, I’m seriously just walking out. This is ridiculous. I’ve got a newborn at home; he’s got a drinking problem.‘
At this point, she popped up from under the counter, presumably ready to help us since she was looking directly at me. At the same time, she finished the thought she was expressing:
‘… How is that fair?‘
It wasn’t entirely clear who she was talking to. I mean, she was looking at me. Was that impatient furrowed look on her face because I hadn’t handed my shoes over yet? Because she wanted to get the hell out of there already? Or was she waiting for me to answer the question? Proddingly, but not-so-helpfully, she cocked her head a few inches to the side and said, again to me:
‘Well?‘
Again, did she want the shoes or the answer? I didn’t know. And I was afraid to pick the wrong one. So I gave her both. I handed over the shoes and a credit card and said:
‘Hey, Gary works in a shoe store. I’m sure he’s just putting off the nightmare for as long as possible.‘
Silence. Gaping stare from Older Girl. Also from Other Girl. And probably, though I didn’t dare look around, from my wife. Apparently, now I’m not supposed to answer questions people look directly at me and ask. That goes against everything my father, my teachers and every law enforcement officer I’ve come into contact with have told me. Or screamed at me, for that matter. I tried some damage control:
‘Anyway, I guess it’s fair, as long as he gets here soon. Unless he’s out drinking in the parking lot now. Or it’s his baby, too.‘
Well, that didn’t help. Geez, given the tirade she went off on then, you’d think I was the alcoholic coworker late for my shift. I can see why Gary drinks, if he has to spend shifts working with that crazy girl. Must be ‘mommy hormones’ or something.
At any rate, we eventually got checked out — by Other Girl, after Older Girl wrapped up her grousing and stormed out the front door, kicking over displays and leaving piles of shoeboxes in her wake. I hope Gary really wasn’t boozing it up in the parking lot; if she found him there, she might have strangled him with a pair of loafer laces.
We made our way back to the hotel — I with my new shoes, and my wife with that look still on her face. And I knew what I had to do. We couldn’t just let the experience hang there; something had to be said about it. I felt in some small way partly responsible, probably, so I figured I should be the one to chime in. I cleared my throat, and by way of apology, sort of, I said:
‘Gee. I guess we should have gotten the suit instead, huh?‘
It’s probably good my loafers don’t have any shoelaces. But I’m sleeping with one eye open tonight, just in case she finds any lying around.
Permalink | 7 CommentsI thought they would end. Despite the many thousands of previous disappointments and all I know about the slime-dripping greediness of the modern ad weasel, I honestly thought they would stop.
I’m talking about the TV spots foe that car company, the ones with grainy flashbacks of kids driving Big Wheels and playing with Ataris, pleading desperately with their adult selves that the memory of those childhood triumphs trumps the bow-bearing gashound now parked in the driveway. You know the ones.
“If it sells product, keep running it up the flagpole to see who flings their wallet at it.”
I said to myself, these ads are Christmas-themed. Christmas is over, relegated back to the Land of Misfit Commercialized Holidays for another three hundred and sixty days or so. The commercials have nothing to connect with now; surely — surely, they have to stop. That’s what I said, anyway.
Until last night, when I saw four of those stupid spots in the space of an hour during some college bowl game or other. It was then that I remembered, violently, the First Rule of Mass Media Marketing:
If it sells product, keep running it up the flagpole to see who flings their wallet at it.
This is followed closely, of course, by the Compulsory Corollary to the First Rule of Mass Media Marketing:
If wallets are flung at it, run it up all the other flagpoles you can get your clammy paws on, and don’t take it down until the money’s all gone. And shoot anyone who gets too close to the poles.
I realized then what I should have known all along — if the relevant auto peddlers are seeing a sales boost from these ads, we’ll be seeing them for months. If there should be a tiny upturn conceivably attributable to this marketing campaign, you can expect to still be hearing, ‘It’s the bestest present… ever‘ at your 4th of July cookout. Maybe while you trick-or-treat.
I wouldn’t have a terrible problem with this, normally. For the most part, the ads are harmless — even cute — and only as annoying as any other pap the money-grubbing markwters might sling at our eyeballs.
Except.
Except that one spot that starts out with the girl. She’s standing there in her CindyLou Who curls and footie pajamas, in a vision from a Christmas long past, arguing with her present self that the present that year was the best ever. Behind her, in the living room, is a pony — an honest-to-god, living, breathing, feed-me-a-carrot-I’m-oh-so-cute pony. Some other little girl appears in the doorway, dropping her horsey action figure in disgust as she comes face-to-snout with the genuine article — much to CindyLou’s delight. Flash-forward to the present day, and the now-grown woman whispers, ‘Perfect.‘ when she sees the shiny new ride her S.O. has just gifted her.
That’s what we’re given to work with. For a chick like that, this car’s even better than My Pretty (Real) Pony from 1970-whatever. That’s their selling point. Instead, all I think when I see it is:
Bitch.
I can relate to Big Wheel Boy or the Atari kid. The latter’s a stretch, of course, because I was an Intellivision snob back in the day, but I can see where they’re going with it. Those are great gifts for a kid of the time, and a memory to cherish, but they’re also somewhat realistic. It makes the ads charming.
Meanwhile, here’s Little Rachel Rich laughing at her little friend because she has a fucking Clydesdale hanging out in her foyer, and they want to sell me the same brand of car this jackhole’s about to drive? Seriously? I’d rather drive to work on the horse.
Maybe it’s just me. I always tend to read too much into commercials. On the other hand, isn’t that what the things are there for? All I know is that if the adbags are trying to entice me into buying luxury shit because I’m supposed to identify with some budding Paris Hilton or Imelda Marcos clone, then one of us is doing something wrong here.
The thing that keeps me awake at night, sweating and shaking, is that it’s probably me.
Permalink | 4 Comments